Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill — Report (6th Day) — Amendment 198 — 6 Sep 2023 at 13:30

Moved by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath

198: After Clause 94, insert the following new Clause-“Duty to reduce health inequalities and improve well-being(1) For the purposes of this section “the general health and well-being objective” is the reduction of health inequalities and the improvement of well-being through the exercise of planning functions in relation to England.(2) A local planning authority must ensure that the development plan for their area includes policies designed to secure that the development and use of land contribute to the general health and well-being objective.(3) In considering whether to grant planning permission or permission in principle and related approvals, a local planning authority or, as the case may be, the Secretary of State must ensure the decision is consistent with achieving the general health and well-being objective.(4) In complying with this section, a local planning authority or, as the case may be, the Secretary of State must have special regard to the desirability of-(a) ensuring that key destinations such as essential shops, schools, parks and open spaces, health facilities and public transport services are in safe and convenient proximity on foot to homes;(b) facilitating access to these key destinations and creating opportunities for everyone to be physically active by improving existing, and creating new, walking and cycling routes and networks;(c) increasing access to high-quality green infra-structure;(d) ensuring a supply of housing which is affordable to and meets the health, accessibility and well-being needs of people who live in the local planning authority's area.”Member's explanatory statementThis new Clause would create a requirement for local planning authorities to include policies in their development plans which contribute to a new general health and well-being objective. It requires local planning authorities and the Secretary of State to ensure consistency with this objective when deciding whether to grant planning permission or permission in principle and related approvals, such as reserved matters.

Ayes 176, Noes 178.

Debate in Parliament |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 04.0%
Con0 154 (+2 tell)56.5%
Crossbench20 715.3%
DUP0 466.7%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab91 (+2 tell) 051.7%
LDem55 066.3%
Non-affiliated3 514.3%
Total:173 17043.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Lord Carrington Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Cavendish of Little VeniceCrossbenchno
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
Lord Cromwell Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Falkner of MargravineCrossbenchno
The Earl of LyttonCrossbenchno
Lord Vaux of HarrowdenCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Austin of DudleyNon-affiliatedaye
Lord Fowler Non-affiliatedaye
Baroness Ritchie of DownpatrickNon-affiliated (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive