Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill — Commons Reasons — Motion B1 (as an amendment to Motion B) — 18 Oct 2023 at 16:42

Moved by Lord Faulks

161D: After Clause 187, insert the following new Clause-“Civil recovery of proceeds of crime: costs of proceedingsCivil recovery: costs of proceedingsAfter section 316 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 insert-“316A Costs orders(1) This section applies to proceedings brought by an enforcement authority under Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 where the property in respect of which the proceedings have been brought has been obtained through economic crime.(2) When assessing what order to make in relation to the costs of proceedings, the court should take into account-(a) the merits of the case,(b) whether the enforcement authority acted reasonably in bringing proceedings,(c) whether costs were reasonably incurred by any party to the proceedings, and(d) the impact of any order on-(i) the enforcement authority, and its ability to carry out its enforcement functions, and(ii) any other party to the proceedings.”””

Ayes 245, Noes 209.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con3 197 (+2 tell)71.4%
Crossbench43 427.2%
DUP4 066.7%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge1 120.0%
Lab111 063.4%
LDem62 (+2 tell) 077.1%
Non-affiliated14 533.3%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP1 050.0%
Total:243 20757.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Agnew of OultonCon (front bench)aye
Lord Clarke of NottinghamConaye
Lord Garnier Con (front bench)aye
Lord Hampton Crossbenchno
Lord Kakkar Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Patel Crossbenchno
Baroness Foster of AghadrumseeNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Young of Old WindsorNon-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive