Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 43 — 11 Mar 2024 at 18:46
Moved by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
43: Clause 89, page 55, line 32, leave out “, 114 (appeals)”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment, alongside others in my name to Clauses 89 and 103, would revert the relevant Clauses back to the ones first introduced in the House of Commons. This would reinstate judicial review principles as the means by which appeals against penalty decisions are heard, rather than such decisions being determined on the merits.
Ayes 204, Noes 192.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 1 | 0 | 4.0% |
Con | 2 | 177 (+2 tell) | 62.0% |
Crossbench | 26 | 5 | 18.0% |
DUP | 0 | 3 | 50.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 1 | 0 | 11.1% |
Lab | 98 (+2 tell) | 0 | 58.5% |
LDem | 62 | 0 | 75.6% |
Non-affiliated | 9 | 4 | 23.6% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
Total: | 202 | 190 | 48.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Black of Brentwood | Con (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Harding of Winscombe | Con (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Falkner of Margravine | Crossbench | no |
Lord Greenway | Crossbench | no |
Lord Hogan-Howe | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Kakkar | Crossbench | no |
Viscount Waverley | Crossbench | no |
Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Taylor of Warwick | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Tyrie | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Young of Old Windsor | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |