Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill — Commons Reasons — Motion D1 (as an amendment to Motion D) — 20 Mar 2024 at 17:59

Moved by Baroness Chakrabarti

6B: Leave out Clause 4 and insert the following new Clause-“Decisions in individual claims(1) Section 2 does not prevent- (a) the Secretary of State or an immigration officer from deciding (under any applicable provision of, or made under, the Immigration Acts) whether the Republic of Rwanda is a safe country for the person in question or for a group of persons to which the person belongs,(b) a court or tribunal considering a review of, or an appeal against, a relevant decision to the extent that the review or appeal is brought on the grounds that the Republic of Rwanda is not a safe country for the person in question or for a group of persons to which that person belongs, or(c) a decision-maker considering whether there is a real risk that the Republic of Rwanda will remove or send the person in question to another State in contravention of any of its international obligations. (2) The court or tribunal may grant an interim remedy that prevents or delays, or that has the effect of preventing or delaying, the removal of the person to the Republic of Rwanda, providing such prevention or delay is for no longer than strictly necessary for the fair and expeditious determination of the case.(3) Section 54 of the Illegal Migration Act 2023 is disapplied for the purposes of this Act.(4) In this section-“interim remedy” means any interim remedy or relief however described (including, in particular, an interim injunction or interdict); “relevant decision” means a decision taking by the Secretary of State or an Immigration officer (under any applicable provision of, or made under, The Immigration Acts) that the Republic of Rwanda is a safe country for the person in question.””

Ayes 263, Noes 233.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop4 016.0%
Con1 199 (+2 tell)70.6%
Crossbench48 1536.6%
DUP0 233.3%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge3 033.3%
Lab120 (+2 tell) 070.9%
LDem70 086.4%
Non-affiliated9 830.4%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 2100.0%
Total:259 22660.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Carrington Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbenchno
Baroness Deech Crossbenchno
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Baroness Fairhead Conaye
Lord Faulks Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Fowler Non-affiliatedno
Lord Green of DeddingtonCrossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedno
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Lord Lupton Non-affiliatedno
Lord Moore of EtchinghamNon-affiliatedno
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Ravensdale Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Thurlow Crossbenchno
Lord Trevethin and Oaksey Crossbenchno
Lord Truscott Non-affiliatedno
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Vaux of HarrowdenCrossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Waverley Crossbenchno
Lord Woolf Crossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive