Victims and Prisoners Bill — Report (3rd Day) — Amendment 113 — 30 Apr 2024 at 17:15
Moved by Baroness Thornton
113: After Clause 38, insert the following new Clause-“Major incidents: duty of candour(1) In discharging their duties in relation to a major incident, public authorities and public servants and officials must at all times act within their powers-(a) in the public interest, and(b) with transparency, candour and frankness.(2) If a major incident results in a court proceeding, official inquiry or investigation, public authorities and public servants and officials have a duty to assist-(a) relating to their own activities, or(b) where their acts or omissions may be relevant.(3) In discharging the duty under subsection (2), public authorities and public servants and officials must-(a) act with proper expedition,(b) act with transparency, candour and frankness,(c) act without favour to their own position,(d) make full disclosure of relevant documents, material and facts,(e) set out their position on the relevant matters at the outset of the proceedings, inquiry or investigation, and(f) provide further information and clarification as ordered by a court or inquiry.(4) In discharging their duty under subsection (2), public authorities and public servants and officials must have regard to the pleadings, allegations, terms of reference and parameters of the relevant proceedings, inquiry or investigation but may not be limited by them, in particular where they hold information which might change the ambit of the said proceedings, inquiry or investigation.(5) The duties in subsections (1) and (2) must-(a) be read subject to existing laws relating to privacy, data protection and national security, and(b) apply in a qualified way with respect to private law and non-public functions as set out in subsection (6), and(c) not be limited by any issue of insurance indemnity.(6) The duties in subsections (1) and (2) will be enforceable by application to the relevant court or inquiry chairperson by any person affected by the alleged breach, or the court or inquiry may act of its own motion.(7) Where there are no extant court or inquiry proceedings, the duties may be enforced by judicial review proceedings in the High Court.”Member’s explanatory statement This new clause would require public authorities, public servants and officials to act in the public interest and with transparency, candour and frankness when carrying out their duties in relation to major incidents.
Ayes 238, Noes 217.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 4 | 0 | 16.0% |
Con | 0 | 197 (+2 tell) | 68.2% |
Crossbench | 36 | 9 | 26.3% |
DUP | 0 | 3 | 50.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 0 | 1 | 11.1% |
Lab | 121 (+2 tell) | 0 | 71.5% |
LDem | 60 | 0 | 75.0% |
Non-affiliated | 10 | 3 | 23.2% |
PC | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
Total: | 236 | 215 | 55.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Cameron of Dillington | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Cavendish of Little Venice | Crossbench | no |
Viscount Colville of Culross | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Viscount Craigavon | Crossbench | no |
Lord Craig of Radley | Crossbench | no |
Lord de Clifford | Crossbench | no |
Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Greenway | Crossbench | no |
Lord Kakkar | Crossbench | no |
Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Young of Old Windsor | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |