Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — Motion E1 (as an amendment to Motion E) — 14 May 2024 at 16:45
Moved by Lord Moynihan
104B: After Clause 308, insert the following new Clause- “Secondary ticketing facilities (1) After section 92 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 insert- “92A Requirements on secondary ticketing facilities (1) A secondary ticketing facility must not- (a) permit a trader or business to list tickets for resale unless the trader or business has provided evidence of proof of purchase to the ticketing facility, or evidence of title to the tickets offered for resale, or (b) permit a reseller to sell more tickets to an event than they can legally purchase from the primary market. (2) A secondary ticketing facility must ensure that the face value of any ticket listed for resale, and the trader or business’s name and trading address are clearly visible, in full, on the first page on which a purchaser can view the ticket. (3) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument- (a) add or amend conditions on secondary ticketing facilities, (b) specify appropriate forms of proof of purchase for the purposes of subsection (1)(a), and (c) specify the form or forms in which the name and trading address required under subsection (2) must be displayed. (4) Regulations under subsection (3) may not revoke conditions on secondary ticketing facilities. (5) Regulations under subsection (3) may not be made unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.” (2) Within the period of nine months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament the outcomes of a review of the impact of subsection (1) on the operation of the secondary ticketing market. (3) In preparing the review under subsection (2), the Secretary of State must consult- (a) ticket sellers and resellers, (b) artists and performers, or their representatives, (c) consumers and representative organisations, and (d) any other persons the Secretary of State deems appropriate. (4) The review under subsection (2) may, if the Secretary of State deems it appropriate, consult on or specify new conditions to be placed on secondary ticketing facilities under the powers in section 92A of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. (5) The obligation under subsection (2) may be met by a review begun before the passing of this Act.””
Ayes 228, Noes 213.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 1 | 0 | 4.0% |
| Con | 4 | 194 (+2 tell) | 68.5% |
| Crossbench | 31 | 5 | 21.1% |
| DUP | 0 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 119 (+2 tell) | 0 | 70.3% |
| LDem | 60 | 0 | 74.1% |
| Non-affiliated | 7 | 7 | 25.5% |
| PC | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 226 | 211 | 54.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Grade of Yarmouth | Con | aye |
| Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | Con | aye |
| Lord Howard of Lympne | Con | aye |
| Lord Moynihan | Con | aye |
| Baroness Cavendish of Little Venice | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Greenway | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Powell of Bayswater | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Skidelsky | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Stirrup | Crossbench (front bench) | no |