Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 14 — 21 Jan 2025 at 18:30
Moved by Viscount Colville of Culross
14: Clause 67, page 75, line 10, after “scientific” insert “and that is conducted in the public interest”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment ensures that to qualify for the scientific research exception for data reuse, that research must be in the public interest. This requirement already exists for medical research, but this amendment would apply it to all scientific research wishing to take advantage of the exception.
Ayes 258, Noes 138.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 1 | 0 | 4.0% |
Con | 159 (+2 tell) | 0 | 54.2% |
Crossbench | 24 | 5 | 17.1% |
DUP | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Judge | 2 | 0 | 22.2% |
Lab | 0 | 121 (+2 tell) | 68.0% |
LDem | 54 | 0 | 66.7% |
Non-affiliated | 7 | 5 | 24.0% |
PC | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 256 | 132 | 47.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Hogan-Howe | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Macpherson of Earl's Court | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | Crossbench | no |
Lord Tarassenko | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Austin of Dudley | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Mann | Non-affiliated | no |
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Verdirame | Non-affiliated | no |