Voting Record — Lord O'Neill of Gatley (25444)
Lord O'Neill of Gatley
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
| From | To | Party | Rebellions (explain...) | Attendance (explain...) | Teller |
| 9 Oct 2017 | still in office | Crossbench | 1 vote out of 8, 12.5% | 8 votes out of 521, 1.5% | 0 times |
| 23 Sep 2016 | 9 Oct 2017 | Non-affiliated | 0 votes out of 0 | 0 votes out of 78, 0.0% | 0 times |
| 28 May 2015 | 23 Sep 2016 | Con | 0 votes out of 80, 0.0% | 80 votes out of 120, 66.7% | 0 times |
External Links
- See Lord O'Neill of Gatley's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
Interesting Votes
Votes in parliament for which this Lord's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this Lord was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
See also all votes... attended | possible
| House | Date | Subject | Lord O'Neill of Gatley | Crossbench Vote | Rôle | |
| Lords | 18 Nov 2020 | United Kingdom Internal Market Bill - Report (1st Day) — Amendment 1 | minority | aye | Rebel | |
| House | Date | Subject | Lord O'Neill of Gatley | Non-affiliated Vote | Rôle | |
| no rebellions, never teller | ||||||
| House | Date | Subject | Lord O'Neill of Gatley | Con Vote | Rôle | |
| no rebellions, never teller | ||||||
| 23 Sep 2016 | Stopped being The Commercial Secretary to the Treasury, | |||||
| 28 May 2015 | Became The Commercial Secretary to the Treasury, | |||||
Policy Comparisons
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this Lord and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
| No policies match this person's votes. You can edit or make a policy that will appear here. | |||
| Agreement | Policy | ||
Possible Friends (more...)
Shows which Lords voted most similarly to this one in the 2017-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both Lords attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between Lords that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
| Agreement | Name | Party | |
| No results found | |||