Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Bill — 2 Sep 1998
Order for Second Reading read.
I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.
I have selected the amendment in the name of the hon. Member for Hull, North (Mr. McNamara). Copies of the amendment have been available in the Vote Office for some time and are still there for hon. Members who have not yet seen the amendment.
That will no longer be sufficient, but the necessary corroborating evidence, such as it is, could easily come from another policeman. The one who has to go to court and assert with complete confidence that so and so is a member of a terrorist organisation will be a superintendent. The guy who tells him that, during interview in the interrogation centre, a chap sat silently or did not respond to questioning is likely to be a constable or even a sergeant. The corroboration will not be very serious if it consists of no more than a superintendent and a sergeant corroborating each other.
On behalf of my right hon. and hon. Friends, I beg to move,
That this House, whilst expressing heartfelt sympathy to the families and friends of those killed and injured in the terrorist bombings in Omagh, Nairobi, Dar es Salaam and Cape Town, and wishing to see the perpetrators of these evil deeds speedily brought to justice, declines to give a Second Reading to a Bill of which hon Members have had sight, in draft for less than 24 hours, which is a contravention of the European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the procedures for the newly established and welcome International Criminal Court; which gives power to senior police officers which past miscarriages of justice in England alone would not justify,
and fails to discriminate between nations abroad which are democratic and respect human and civil rights and those which are undemocratic, tyrannous, fail to respect democracy, human and civil rights, repress their populations and pay scant regard to the rights of women.
That was demonstrated by the referendums on both sides of the border which endorsed the Good Friday agreement. Over the whole island of Ireland, nine out of every 10 people who voted in that referendum supported the agreement and made it clear that they had had enough of violence. However, they made something else clear.
Question, That the Question be now put, put and agreed to.
Question put accordingly, That the amendment be made:--
The House divided: Ayes 17, Noes 391.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Lab||244 (+2 tell)||17 (+2 tell)||0||63.4%|
|Mrs Irene Adams||Paisley North||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Mr Tony Benn||Chesterfield||Lab||aye|
|Mr Harold Best||Leeds North West||Lab||aye|
|Dennis Canavan||Falkirk West||whilst Lab||tellaye|
|Mr Robin Corbett||Birmingham, Erdington||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Jeremy Corbyn||Islington North||Lab||tellaye|
|John Cryer||Hornchurch||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Mr Tam Dalyell||Linlithgow||Lab||aye|
|Bill Etherington||Sunderland North||Lab||aye|
|Mr Bernie Grant||Tottenham||Lab||aye|
|Lynne Jones||Birmingham, Selly Oak||Lab||aye|
|John McAllion||Dundee East||Lab||aye|
|John Martin McDonnell||Hayes and Harlington||Lab||aye|
|Mr Kevin McNamara||Kingston upon Hull North||Lab||aye|
|Mr Kerry Pollard||St Albans||Lab||aye|
|Mr Brian Sedgemore||Hackney South and Shoreditch||Lab||aye|