[S1M-921.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 1 Jun 2000 at 17:04
This looks like the vote on S1M-921.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-06-01 is:
*S1M-921.1 Fiona Hyslop: Tackling Rough Sleeping in Glasgow and across Scotland—As an amendment to motion (S1M-921) in the name of Ms Wendy Alexander, leave out from "welcomes" to "recognises" and insert "notes the commitment of the Scottish Executive to achieving its aim that no-one should have to sleep rough by the end of this session of the Parliament; notes that this commitment has been moved back from an original deadline of 2002, and believes that the challenge funding nature of the Rough Sleepers Initiative aligned with a general fall in housing resources is hindering the ability of the Executive to meet its target of ending rough sleeping; however recognises". Supported by: Mr Lloyd Quinan*, Tricia Marwick*
You can search for this motion (S1M-921.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S1M-921.1, in the name of Fiona Hyslop, which seeks to amend motion S1M-921, in the name of Wendy Alexander, on tackling rough sleeping in Glasgow and across Scotland, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 13 | 0 | 68.4% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 49 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 0 | 27 | 0 | 81.8% |
Total: | 63 | 42 | 0 | 82.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Lewis Macdonald | Aberdeen Central | Lab | aye |