Motion Moved on Consideration of Commons Reason No. 27A — 27 Nov 2000 at 21:38
27BLord Brabazon of Tara rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 27 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 27A, leave out "not".
On Question, Whether Amendment No. 27B, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on their Amendment No. 27 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 27A, to leave out "not" be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 132; Not-Contents, 125.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 0 | 1 | 3.8% |
| Con | 71 (+2 tell) | 2 | 32.3% |
| Crossbench | 8 | 5 | 8.1% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 2 | 115 (+2 tell) | 59.5% |
| LDem | 48 | 0 | 77.4% |
| Total: | 130 | 123 | 37.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Baroness Greengross | Crossbench | no |
| Baroness Hogg | Con (front bench) | no |
| Baroness Jeger | Lab | aye |
| Lord Marsh | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Marshall of Knightsbridge | Crossbench | no |
| Baroness O'Cathain | Con (front bench) | no |
| Baroness Richardson of Calow | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Baroness Strange | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Young of Dartington | Lab | aye |