[S1M-1941] Decision Time — 30 May 2001 at 16:33
This looks like the vote on S1M-1941
The description in the bulletin on 2001-05-17 is:
*S1M-1941 Mr Jim Wallace: Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Iain Gray*
The description in the bulletin on 2001-05-21 is:
S1M-1941 Mr Jim Wallace: Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Iain Gray
The description in the bulletin on 2001-05-29 is:
S1M-1941 Mr Jim Wallace: Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Iain Gray
You can search for this motion (S1M-1941) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that motion S1M-1941, in the name of Jim Wallace, which seeks agreement that the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
I hear a no from Mr Gallie. There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 1 | 0 | 12 | 68.4% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 33 | 1 | 0 | 63.0% |
| LDem | 10 | 0 | 0 | 62.5% |
| SNP | 12 | 0 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Total: | 59 | 1 | 12 | 57.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
| Murray Tosh | South of Scotland | Con | aye |
| Maureen Macmillan | Highlands and Islands | Lab | no |