Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill [Lords] — [1st Allotted Day] — New Clause 17 — Judgement creditor of commonhold association — 11 Mar 2002 at 16:00
I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
We have tabled the new clause on judgment creditors of commonhold associations because, in discussion with the Law Society, we came to the conclusion that there is inadequate provision for dealing with questions of liability for the viability of the commonhold system. The problem that arises relates particularly to the form of the commonhold association memorandum and articles of association.
Question put, That the clause be read a Second time:-
The House divided: Ayes 140, Noes 241.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 113 (+2 tell) | 0 | 70.1% |
| DUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Lab | 240 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 59.0% |
| LDem | 0 | 25 | 0 | 47.2% |
| PC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25.0% |
| UUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Total: | 241 | 140 | 0 | 60.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||