[S1M-3149.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 May 2002 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-3149.2
The description in the bulletin on 2002-05-28 is:
*S1M-3149.2 Roseanna Cunningham: Alternatives to Custody-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3149) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, leave out from "commends" to end and insert "regrets the failure of the Scottish Executive adequately to develop a range of high quality alternatives to custody which fit the changing pattern of offending behaviour across Scotland; recognises the importance of programmes which are well-resourced and available across every jurisdiction in Scotland, and believes that a greater element of restorative justice should be introduced into the Scottish criminal justice system whether dealing with adults or young offenders."
You can search for this motion (S1M-3149.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S1M-3149.2, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3149, in the name of Jim Wallace, on alternatives to custody, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 94.7% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 82 | 30 | 0 | 89.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |