[S1M-3396.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 19 Dec 2002 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-3396.1
The description in the bulletin on 2002-12-19 is:
*S1M-3396.1 Alex Fergusson: Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill—As an amendment to motion (S1M-3396) in the name of Ross Finnie, insert at end "but, in doing so, regrets that the provision in the bill of a right to buy for some tenants has already led to a significant reduction in the amount of land let under medium- and long-term arrangements, and believes that the enactment of such a provision will minimise land available for rent, including holdings under the new tenancies proposed in the bill, confining tenancies to those of a very short-term nature with a resultant negative impact on the management of the tenanted sector." Supported by: Alex Johnstone*, Murdo Fraser*
You can search for this motion (S1M-3396.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S1M-3396.1, in the name of Alex Fergusson, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3396, in the name of Ross Finnie, on the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 78.9% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 90.9% |
| LDem | 11 | 0 | 0 | 68.8% |
| SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 69.7% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 89 | 15 | 0 | 81.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||