[S1M-3760] Decision Time — 16 Jan 2003 at 17:00

This looks like the vote on S1M-3760

The description in the bulletin on 2003-01-13 is:

*S1M-3760 Mr John Swinney: The Current International Situation-That the Parliament endorses United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441 on the basis that it provides a mandate for weapons inspection in Iraq; welcomes the legal opinion of Matrix Chambers on behalf of CND which concluded that Resolution 1441 does not provide an authorisation for military action in Iraq and that any such use of force would breach international law; believes that UN weapons inspectors must be afforded total freedom of access in Iraq and to all evidence in the possession of other states, together with sufficient time in order to produce a comprehensive report for the consideration of the Security Council on the state of Iraqi compliance with the resolution; believes that no commitment of UK forces should be made without a specific mandate for military action in Iraq in the form of a further Security Council resolution based on clear, published and compelling evidence provided by the UN inspectorate of a material breach of Resolution 1441, and expresses its deep and serious concern that Her Majesty's Government is currently pursuing an inevitable path to war.

The description in the bulletin on 2003-01-14 is:

S1M-3760 The Current International Situation (lodged on 10 January 2003) Christine Grahame*, Richard Lochhead*

The description in the bulletin on 2003-01-15 is:

S1M-3760 The Current International Situation (lodged on 10 January 2003) Brian Adam*, Alex Neil*

The description in the bulletin on 2003-01-16 is:

S1M-3760 The Current International Situation (lodged on 10 January 2003) Andrew Wilson*, Mr Gil Paterson*, Mr Adam Ingram*, Bruce Crawford*, Fiona Hyslop*, Nicola Sturgeon*, Roseanna Cunningham*, Michael Russell*, Kay Ullrich*, Tricia Marwick*, Michael Matheson*, Ms Sandra White*, Mr Andrew Welsh*, Mr Lloyd Quinan*, Alasdair Morgan*, Mr Kenny MacAskill*, Stewart Stevenson*, Mr Kenneth Gibson*, Irene McGugan*, Shona Robison*, Linda Fabiani*, Fergus Ewing*

You can search for this motion (S1M-3760) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The fifth question is, that motion S1M-3760, in the name of John Swinney, on the current international situation, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)AbstentionsTurnout
Con19 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 30100.0%
Lab48 1394.5%
LDem0 15093.8%
SNP0 30090.9%
SSP0 10100.0%
Total:67 51394.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
John McAllionDundee EastLabno
Gordon JacksonGlasgow GovanLababstention
Pauline McNeillGlasgow KelvinLababstention
Elaine SmithCoatbridge and ChrystonLababstention

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive