[S1M-4012.5 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 13 Mar 2003 at 16:31

This looks like the vote on S1M-4012.5

The description in the bulletin on 2003-03-13 is:

*S1M-4012.5 Nora Radcliffe: The Current International Situation—As an amendment to motion (S1M-4012) in the name of Mr John Swinney, leave out from first "believes" to end and insert "condemns the failure of the Iraqi regime to respect international law and human rights; supports the United Nations’ (UN) efforts to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction under UN Security Council Resolution 1441; calls for the inspectors to be given sufficient time and resources to continue their work as long as the Security Council assesses that progress can be made; believes that only as a last resort, once all other options have been exhausted, should military action in Iraq be undertaken, and opposes any military action not sanctioned by a further resolution from the Security Council and an affirmative vote on a substantive motion in the House of Commons." Supported by: Tavish Scott*, John Farquhar Munro*, Iain Smith*, Ian Jenkins*, Mr Mike Rumbles*, George Lyon*, Robert Brown*, Mr Keith Raffan*, Mr Jamie Stone*, Donald Gorrie*

You can search for this motion (S1M-4012.5) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The next question is, that amendment S1M-4012.5, in the name of Nora Radcliffe, which seeks to amend the amended motion, in the name of John Swinney, on the current international situation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |