[S2M-828] Decision Time — 29 Jan 2004 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-828
The description in the bulletin on 2004-01-28 is:
*S2M-828 Cathy Jamieson: Modernising the Court System - A New Supreme Court-That the Parliament believes that it is a cardinal feature of a modern democratic state that the judiciary should be separated from the legislature and therefore supports the creation of a new Supreme Court believing that it will strengthen the independence of the judiciary. Supported by: Colin Boyd QC*, Hugh Henry*
The description in the bulletin on 2004-01-29 is:
S2M-828 Modernising the Court System - A New Supreme Court (lodged on 27 January 2004) Mrs Elish Angiolini*
You can search for this motion (S2M-828) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S2M-828, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on modernising the court system and a new supreme court, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 0 | 16 | 88.9% |
| Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
| LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 70.6% |
| SNP | 0 | 1 | 20 | 80.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Total: | 61 | 9 | 37 | 84.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
| Adam Ingram | South of Scotland | SNP | no |