[S2M-2132.6 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 9 Dec 2004 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-2132.6
The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-09 is:
*S2M-2132.6 Mr Duncan McNeil: Iraq—As an amendment to motion (S2M-2132) in the name of Carolyn Leckie, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "believes that there should be a peaceful and democratic Iraq and supports all those who are working for world peace and the extension of democracy; recognises the importance of international support for the people of Iraq in their efforts to achieve stability and democracy; reaffirms its support for a route map to peace in the Middle East which delivers a free and viable Palestinian state and security for Israel; affirms the importance of the principles of the rule of law, including respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and of democracy, including free and fair elections; believes that the planned withdrawal of British forces should only occur at the first practicable opportunity after the establishment of a democratic government in Iraq; acknowledges that the United Nations should play the leading role in assisting the Iraqi people, in particular in the formation of institutions for representative government; continues to express its gratitude to UK service personnel and their families including those from Scotland, and offers its sincere sympathy to the families of those members of the armed forces who have made the ultimate sacrifice in the service of their country." Supported by: Scott Barrie*
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S2M-2132.6, in the name of Duncan McNeil, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2132, in the name of Carolyn Leckie, on Iraq, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
There will be a division.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Abstentions||Turnout|
|Phil Gallie||South of Scotland||Con||abstention|
|Elaine Smith||Coatbridge and Chryston||Lab||abstention|