[S2M-2119] Decision Time — 19 Jan 2005 at 17:00

This looks like the vote on S2M-2119

The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-07 is:

*S2M-2119 Cathy Jamieson: Constitutional Reform Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament agrees the principle of having a clear and transparent separation between the judiciary and the legislature and agrees that provisions in the Constitutional Reform Bill establishing a Supreme Court, and provisions consequential thereto, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry*

The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-13 is:

S2M-2119 Cathy Jamieson: Constitutional Reform Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament agrees the principle of having a clear and transparent separation between the judiciary and the legislature and agrees that provisions in the Constitutional Reform Bill establishing a Supreme Court, and provisions consequential thereto, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry

The description in the bulletin on 2005-01-17 is:

S2M-2119 Cathy Jamieson: Constitutional Reform Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament agrees the principle of having a clear and transparent separation between the judiciary and the legislature and agrees that provisions in the Constitutional Reform Bill establishing a Supreme Court, and provisions consequential thereto, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry

You can search for this motion (S2M-2119) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The fourth question is, that motion S2M-2119, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the Constitutional Reform Bill, under United Kingdom legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)AbstentionsTurnout
Con0 180100.0%
Green0 70100.0%
Independent1 40100.0%
Lab46 0093.9%
LDem16 0094.1%
SNP0 21084.0%
SSCUP0 10100.0%
SSP0 5083.3%
Total:63 56093.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive