Prevention of Terrorism Bill — 7 Mar 2005 at 16:45

<[i>Amendments Nos. 48 to 54 not moved.]

Clause 2 negatived.

Clause 3 <[i>Duration and renewal of non-derogating control orders]:

moved Amendment No. 55:

Page 4, line 36, at beginning insert-

(A1) The Secretary of State may make a control order against an individual if he-

(a) has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the individual is or has been involved in terrorism-related activity; and

(b) considers that it is necessary, for purposes connected with protecting members of the public from a risk of terrorism, to make a control order imposing obligations on that individual.

(A2) The Secretary of State may make a control order against an individual who is for the time being bound by a control order made by the court only if he does so-

(a) after the court has determined that its order should be revoked; but

(b) while the effect of the revocation has been postponed for the purpose of giving the Secretary of State an opportunity to decide whether to exercise his own powers to make a control order against the individual.

(A3) A control order made by the Secretary of State is called a non-derogating control order."

moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 55, Amendment No. 56:

Line 2, leave out "Secretary of State" and insert "court"

On Question, Whether Amendment No. 56, as an amendment to Amendment No. 55, shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 249; Not-Contents, 119.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop2 08.0%
Con118 (+1 tell) 056.9%
Crossbench47 629.9%
Green1 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab20 110 (+2 tell)64.4%
LDem57 (+1 tell) 084.1%
Total:246 11653.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Viscount Bledisloe Crossbenchno
Lord Butler of BrockwellCrossbenchno
Lord Hannay of ChiswickCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Lord Marsh Crossbenchno
Lord Vincent of ColeshillCrossbenchno
Lord Acton Labaye
Lord Ahmed Labaye
Lord Borrie Lab (minister)aye
Lord Clinton-Davis Labaye
Baroness David Labaye
Lord Grantchester Lab (minister)aye
Baroness Hayman Lab (minister)aye
Lord Irvine of LairgLabaye
Lord Judd Lab (minister)aye
Baroness Kennedy of The ShawsLabaye
Baroness Mallalieu Lab (minister)aye
Lord Mitchell Lab (minister)aye
Lord Morgan Lab (minister)aye
Lord Morris of AberavonLabaye
Lord Plant of HighfieldLab (minister)aye
Lord Prys-Davies Labaye
Baroness Rendell of BaberghLab (minister)aye
Lord Rogers of RiversideLabaye
Lord Sheldon Lab (minister)aye
Baroness Turner of CamdenLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive