Voting Record — Baroness David (13397)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
- See Baroness David's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
Votes in parliament for which this Lord's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this Lord was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Baroness David||Lab Vote||Rôle|
|Lords||4 Jul 2007||Pensions Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||30 Oct 2006||Education and Inspections Bill — Stop faith schools requiring that candidates for headteacher posts belong to the relevant faith — rejected||tellaye||no||Rebel Teller|
|Lords||24 Oct 2006||Education and Inspections Bill -- Amendment No. 91A||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||8 Mar 2005||Prevention of Terrorism Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||7 Mar 2005||Prevention of Terrorism Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||15 Jul 2004||Children Bill [HL]||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||5 Jul 2004||Children Bill [HL]||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||21 Oct 2003||Hunting Bill — amendment — registered hunting||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||21 Oct 2003||Hunting Bill: amendment — "intentional" hunting||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||23 Jun 2003||Communications Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||4 Feb 2003||House of Lords Reform — 60 per cent elected/40 per cent appointed||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||2 Dec 1999||Succession to the Crown (Amendment)||Majority||unknown||Unknown|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this Lord and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
|38%||Abortion, Embryology and Euthanasia- Against|
|50%||Fox hunting - Ban|
|98%||Homosexuality - Equal rights|
|100%||Labour's Terrorism laws - For|
|100%||Smoking ban - In favour|
|50%||Stop climate change|
Shows which Lords voted most similarly to this one in the Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both Lords attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between Lords that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|100.0%||Baroness Hale of Richmond||Judge|