[S2M-3866.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 4 May 2006 at 17:01

This looks like the vote on S2M-3866.4

The description in the bulletin on 2006-05-04 is:

*S2M-3866.4 Jackie Baillie: Replacement of Trident—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3866) in the name of Chris Ballance, leave out from "believes" to end and insert "notes that in 2005 the UK Government reaffirmed its commitment to all its obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty 1967; notes the commitment of all three major UK parties to retain an independent nuclear deterrent; notes the comments of the UK Government that no decisions on replacing Trident have yet been taken; believes there should be the fullest possible public debate on any decision to replace the Trident nuclear weapons system, considering all possible options including non-replacement; notes the significant reductions in the United Kingdom’s nuclear weapons arsenal; is committed to the goal of the global elimination of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, and wishes to see the United Kingdom continue to work both bilaterally and through the United Nations to urge states not yet party to non-proliferation instruments to become so, to remain committed to the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and to make further progress toward significant reductions in the nuclear arsenals of the major nuclear powers." Supported by: Scott Barrie* Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support

You can search for this motion (S2M-3866.4) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The first question is, that amendment S2M-3866.4, in the name of Jackie Baillie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3866, in the name of Chris Ballance, on the replacement of Trident, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)AbstentionsTurnout
Con15 0088.2%
Green7 00100.0%
Independent2 0040.0%
Lab0 42696.0%
LDem17 00100.0%
SNP19 1080.0%
SSCUP0 10100.0%
SSP5 0083.3%
Total:65 44689.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Bill ButlerGlasgow AnnieslandLababstention
Marlyn GlenNorth East ScotlandLababstention
Kate MacleanDundee WestLababstention
Pauline McNeillGlasgow KelvinLababstention
Cathy PeattieFalkirk EastLababstention
Elaine SmithCoatbridge and ChrystonLababstention
Fiona HyslopLothiansSNPaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive