[S3M-3757] Decision Time — 25 Mar 2009 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-3757
The description in the bulletin on 2009-03-23 is:
*S3M-3757 Gil Paterson on behalf of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee: Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament: Review of Section 8 of the Code of Conduct—That the Parliament agrees to amend the Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament by replacing Section 8 and Section 9.1.6(b) (in Volume 2) with Section 8 and Section 9.1.6(b) as set out in Annex A of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee’s 9th Report 2008 (Session 3), Review of Section 8 of the Code of Conduct (SP Paper 176), with effect from 27 March 2009. Supported by: Peter Peacock*
You can search for this motion (S3M-3757) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S3M-3757, in the name of Gil Paterson, on behalf of the SPPA committee, on the "Review of Section 8 of the Code of Conduct", be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 36 | 0 | 0 | 78.3% |
LDem | 4 | 8 | 2 | 87.5% |
SNP | 44 | 0 | 0 | 93.6% |
Total: | 100 | 8 | 2 | 86.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Jim Hume | South of Scotland | LDem | aye |
Alison McInnes | North East Scotland | LDem | aye |
Hugh O'Donnell | Central Scotland | LDem | aye |
Iain Smith | North East Fife | LDem | aye |
Robert Brown | Glasgow | LDem | abstention |
Jim Tolson | Dunfermline West | LDem | abstention |