Coroners and Justice Bill — Report (3rd Day) — 28 Oct 2009 at 19:44

Clause 64 : Conspiracy

Amendment 66B

Moved by Lord Thomas of Gresford

66B: Clause 64, leave out Clause 64

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 45 (+1 tell)23.7%
Crossbench6 14 (+1 tell)11.2%
Lab77 (+2 tell) 237.3%
LDem38 050.7%
UUP0 133.3%
Total:121 6227.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Baroness D'Souza Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Jay of EwelmeCrossbenchno
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Lord Low of DalstonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Martin of SpringburnCrossbenchno
Lord Woolf Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Kennedy of The ShawsLabaye
Lord Puttnam Lab (minister)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive