Terrorist Asset-Freezing (Temporary Provisions) Bill (Allocation of Time) — Clause 1 — Temporary validity of certain Orders in Council — 8 Feb 2010 at 21:00
During the debate the Labour Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury described the clause being voted on as one[1]:
- that prevents terrorists from having access to financing or the financial system.
The Liberal Democrats objected, and voted against, due to the lack of safeguards such as an appeals process, as they had explained during a division on a proposed amendment to clause 1[2]
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 49 | 0 | 1 | 25.9% |
DUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12.5% |
Independent | 2 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 249 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 71.9% |
LDem | 0 | 36 (+2 tell) | 0 | 60.3% |
PC | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
SDLP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
SNP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14.3% |
Total: | 301 | 41 | 1 | 54.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Stewart Jackson | Peterborough | Con (front bench) | both |