Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill — Report (1st Day) — 26 Feb 2013 at 16:54

Clause 5 : Accounts, reports and payments to directors

Amendment 11

Moved by Viscount Younger of Leckie

11: Clause 5, page 3, line 30, at end insert-

“( ) Where an order has been made under section 2, each report prepared by the directors of the Bank for a financial year under section 415 of the Companies Act 2006 must include-

(a) an explanation of the steps that the Bank took in that year to ensure that its activities in making, facilitating or encouraging investments in that year and in any previous financial years would (taken as a whole) be likely to contribute to a reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions, and

(b) a statement of the directors’ views on the likely effect of its activities in those years on global greenhouse gas emissions.”

Amendment 12 (to Amendment 11) not moved.

Amendment 11 agreed.

Clause 7 : Conciliation before institution of proceedings

Amendment 13

Moved by Baroness Turner of Camden

13: Clause 7, page 4, line 33, at end insert-

“( ) In the case of alleged unfair dismissal, should the conciliation officer fail to secure a settlement, the claimant may proceed forthwith to an employment tribunal.”

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con137 (+1 tell) 063.0%
Crossbench21 2423.6%
DUP1 025.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Judge1 114.3%
Lab0 158 (+2 tell)70.5%
LDem63 (+1 tell) 068.8%
PC0 150.0%
UKIP1 033.3%
UUP1 033.3%
Total:225 18554.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Lord Alton of LiverpoolCrossbenchno
Lord Armstrong of IlminsterCrossbenchno
Lord Bew Crossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbenchno
Baroness Cox Crossbenchno
Viscount Craigavon Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Currie of MaryleboneCrossbenchno
Lord Dear Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Hameed Crossbenchno
Lord Hannay of ChiswickCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Jay of EwelmeCrossbenchno
Lord Kerr of KinlochardCrossbenchno
Lord Low of DalstonCrossbenchno
The Countess of MarCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Rowe-Beddoe Crossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Slim Crossbenchno
Lord Sutherland of HoundwoodCrossbenchno
Viscount Tenby Crossbenchno
Viscount Falkland LDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive