Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill — Committal to Committee and Timetable — 3 Sep 2013 at 18:50
The majority of MPs voted to send the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill for consideration in committee and to approve the proposed timetable for its consideration there.
This is akin to a vote on a timetabling motion; it is not possible to ascribe a position in relation to the substance of the Bill on the basis of the way an MP has voted in this division.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||264 (+2 tell)||7||0||89.5%|
|Lab||0||222 (+2 tell)||0||86.8%|
|Stephen Williams||Bristol West||LDem (front bench)||no|
|David Nuttall||Bury North||Con (front bench)||no|
|David Davis||Haltemprice and Howden||Con||no|
|Andrew Bridgen||North West Leicestershire||Con (front bench)||no|
|Zac Goldsmith||Richmond Park||Con (front bench)||no|
|Philip Davies||Shipley||Con (front bench)||no|
|Andrew George||St Ives||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Chris White||Warwick and Leamington||Con (front bench)||no|