Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill — Committee (2nd Day) — 15 Jan 2014 at 21:37
Amendment 45A not moved.
Clause 27: Changes to existing limits
Amendment 46
Moved by Lord Wallace of Tankerness
46: Clause 27, page 14, line 42, leave out subsection (1) and insert-
“(1) Section 94 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (limits on controlled expenditure by third parties) is amended in accordance with subsections (1A) to (1E).
“(1A) In subsection (3), for paragraph (a) (but not the “and” after it) substitute-
“(a) during a regulated period-
(i) any controlled expenditure is incurred in a part of the United Kingdom by or on behalf of a third party in excess of the limit for that part of the United Kingdom mentioned in subsection (5), or
(ii) any controlled expenditure is incurred in a particular parliamentary constituency by or on behalf of a third party in excess of the limit mentioned in subsection (5ZA),”.
(1B) In subsection (5)-
(a) in the opening words, for “(3)” substitute “(3)(a)(i)”;
(b) in paragraph (a), for “£10,000” substitute “£20,000”;
(c) in paragraph (b), for “£5,000” substitute “£10,000.”
(1C) After subsection (5) insert-
“(5ZA) The limit referred to in subsection (3)(a)(ii) is 0.05% of the total of the maximum campaign expenditure limits in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.”
(1D) In subsection (5A) for “(5)” substitute “(5ZA)”.
(1E) In subsection (10), omit the “and” at the end of paragraph (c) and after paragraph (d) insert-
“(e) the “maximum campaign expenditure limit” in a part of the United Kingdom is the limit imposed by paragraph 3 of Schedule 9 in relation to campaign expenditure incurred in the relevant period (within the meaning of that paragraph) by or on behalf of a registered party which contests all the constituencies in that part (and to which sub-paragraph (6) of that paragraph does not apply).””
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 97 (+1 tell) | 1 (+1 tell) | 43.7% |
Crossbench | 5 | 5 | 5.2% |
Judge | 0 | 1 | 6.7% |
Lab | 13 | 7 | 8.8% |
LDem | 31 (+1 tell) | 12 (+1 tell) | 43.7% |
Total: | 146 | 26 | 23.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Allan of Hallam | LDem | aye |
Baroness Barker | LDem (front bench) | aye |
Lord Berkeley | Lab | aye |
Lord Campbell-Savours | Lab (minister) | aye |
Lord Clement-Jones | LDem (front bench) | aye |
Baroness Corston | Lab (minister) | aye |
Lord Cotter | LDem | aye |
Lord Dholakia | LDem (front bench) | aye |
Lord Greaves | LDem | tellaye |
Lord Hamilton of Epsom | Con | tellaye |
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | Con (front bench) | aye |
Lord Howarth of Newport | Lab | aye |
Lord Layard | Lab | aye |
Lord Phillips of Sudbury | LDem | aye |
Lord Roper | LDem (front bench) | aye |
Lord Shipley | LDem (front bench) | aye |
Lord Shutt of Greetland | LDem (front bench) | aye |
Lord Soley | Lab (minister) | aye |
Baroness Taylor of Bolton | Lab (minister) | aye |
Lord Taylor of Goss Moor | LDem | aye |
Lord Tyler | LDem | aye |
Baroness Williams of Crosby | LDem | aye |