Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill — Schedule 3 — Inclusion of Staff Costs in Controlled Expenditure — 22 Jan 2014 at 16:30
The majority of MPs voted to include staff costs when calculating the amount spent on campaigning in general elections by those who are not candidates, or who are not putting up candidates in general elections. The amount such organisations are permitted to spend is restricted by law.
Those MPs voting with the majority were increasing the restrictions on third party organisations (such as charities) who campaign during elections.
MPs were considering the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill.[1]
The motion which was the subject of this vote stated:
- That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 108
The explanatory notes to the Lords amendments state[2]:
- Lords Amendment 108 would exclude from the calculation of controlled expenditure staff costs in relation to transport, press conferences or organised media events and public rallies or other public events for staff who are directly employed by the third party.
The text of the amendment[4] was:
- Page 57, line 14, at end insert—
- “Exclusions of background staff costs
- 1A Nothing in sub-paragraphs (3) to (5) of paragraph 1 shall be taken as extending to any expenses incurred in respect of remuneration or allowances payable to any member of staff (whether permanent or otherwise) of the third party.”
This amendment would have been inserted into Schedule 3 of the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill which itself inserts a new Schedule into The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
The provision the amendment acts on relates to guidance as to what kind of expenses count as controlled expenses for the purposes of expenditure by third parties during general elections. The guidance in question is to be produced by the Electoral Commission and submitted to the Secretary of State for their approval.
- [1] Parliament's webpage on the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill 2013-14
- [2] Explanatory notes on the Lords Amendments to the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill, as brought from the House of Lords on 21 January 2014.
- [3] Lords Amendments to the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill - 22 January 2014
- [4] Page of Lords Amendments to the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill containing Amendment 108
- [5] Version of the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill which the amendments refer to - 10th October 2013
- [6] Schedule 3 of the version of the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill which the amendments refer to - 10th October 2013
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Alliance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Con | 273 (+1 tell) | 7 | 0 | 92.1% |
DUP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 62.5% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 0 | 238 (+2 tell) | 0 | 93.4% |
LDem | 37 (+1 tell) | 10 | 0 | 85.7% |
PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Respect | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SDLP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 310 | 276 | 0 | 91.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Michael Crockart | Edinburgh West | LDem (front bench) | no |
Philip Davies | Shipley | Con (front bench) | no |
David Davis | Haltemprice and Howden | Con | no |
Andrew George | St Ives | LDem (front bench) | no |
Stephen Gilbert | St Austell and Newquay | LDem (front bench) | no |
Zac Goldsmith | Richmond Park | Con (front bench) | no |
Martin Horwood | Cheltenham | LDem | no |
Julian Huppert | Cambridge | LDem (front bench) | no |
Charlotte Leslie | Bristol North West | Con (front bench) | no |
Anne Main | St Albans | Con (front bench) | no |
Greg Mulholland | Leeds North West | LDem (front bench) | no |
David Nuttall | Bury North | Con (front bench) | no |
Alan Reid | Argyll and Bute | LDem (front bench) | no |
Adrian Sanders | Torbay | LDem (front bench) | no |
Chris White | Warwick and Leamington | Con (front bench) | no |
Mark Williams | Ceredigion | LDem (front bench) | no |
Roger Williams | Brecon and Radnorshire | LDem (front bench) | no |