Criminal Justice and Courts Bill — Report (3rd Day) — 27 Oct 2014 at 18:45

Amendment 158

Moved by Lord Pannick

158: Clause 71, page 69, line 28, after “paragraph” insert “, or, notwithstanding a failure to do so, the tribunal in its discretion considers that it is nevertheless appropriate to grant the applicant permission or leave to apply for relief”

Amendment 158 agreed.

Amendments 159 not moved.

Clause 72: Use of information about financial resources

Amendments 159A and 159B not moved.

Amendment 160

Moved by Lord Pannick

160: Clause 72, page 69, line 44, leave out “must” and insert “may”

Amendment 160 agreed.

Amendment 160A not moved.

Amendment 161

Moved by Lord Pannick

161: Clause 72, page 70, line 3, leave out “must” and insert “may”

Amendment 161 agreed.

Amendments 161A to 163 not moved.

Clause 73: Interveners and costs

Amendment 164

Moved by Lord Pannick

164: Clause 73, page 70, line 21, leave out subsections (2) to (6) and insert-

“( ) The High Court and the Court of Appeal shall have a discretion whether to order an intervener to pay the costs of a relevant party to the proceedings, and shall have a discretion whether to order a relevant party to the proceedings to pay the intervener’s costs.”

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 03.8%
Con1 130 (+1 tell)56.7%
Crossbench34 (+1 tell) 420.9%
DUP0 133.3%
Green1 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge4 (+1 tell) 033.3%
Lab147 065.3%
LDem16 48 (+1 tell)61.9%
PC1 050.0%
UUP1 1100.0%
Total:207 18449.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Lord Lucas Con (front bench)aye
Viscount Craigavon Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Mawson Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Thomas of SwynnertonCrossbenchno
Lord Carlile of BerriewLDemaye
Baroness Doocey LDem (front bench)aye
Lord Goodhart LDemaye
Baroness Harris of RichmondLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Kirkwood of KirkhopeLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Lester of Herne HillLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Loomba LDemaye
Lord Macdonald of River GlavenLDemaye
Lord Marks of Henley-on-ThamesLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Redesdale LDemaye
Lord Roberts of LlandudnoLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Sharkey LDem (front bench)aye
Lord Steel of AikwoodLDemaye
Lord Thomas of GresfordLDemaye
Baroness Thomas of WinchesterLDem (front bench)aye
Baroness Tonge LDemaye
Lord Tyler LDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive