High Speed Rail (London — West Midlands) Bill — New Clause 22 — Construction of an Integrated Euston Station — 23 Mar 2016 at 16:16
The majority of MPs voted against requiring the body appointed to deliver High Speed 2 Rail to work to develop an Integrated Euston Station.
MPs were considering the High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill.
The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was titled: Construction of an integrated Euston Station and began:
- (1) The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to take reasonable steps to develop integrated and comprehensive design and construction plans for Euston Station that include integration with other Euston Schemes.
The ‘nominated undertaker’, under the Bill, is the body appointed by the Secretary of State that is responsible for delivering the Proposed Scheme under the powers granted by the Bill
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||249 (+2 tell)||7||0||78.2%|
|Lab||0||172 (+2 tell)||0||75.3%|
|Victoria Prentis||Banbury||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Dominic Grieve||Beaconsfield||Con (front bench)||aye|
|David Nuttall||Bury North||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Dame Cheryl Gillan||Chesham and Amersham||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Craig Tracey||North Warwickshire||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Jeremy Lefroy||Stafford||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Chris White||Warwick and Leamington||Con (front bench)||aye|