UK Withdrawal from the EU — Consider Cross Party Proposal To Seek Majority Support in the House of Commons — 14 Mar 2019 at 17:00
The majority of MPs voted for the Government to retain control of the House of Commons' consideration of the UK's withdrawal from the EU and against considering a proposal from a cross-party group of MPs on a way for the House of Commons to reach a position supported by the majority of MPs.
MPs were considering a motion stating:
- That this House:
- (1) notes the resolutions of the House of 12 and 13 March, and accordingly agrees that the Government will seek to agree with the European Union an extension of the period specified in Article 50(3);
- (2) agrees that, if the House has passed a resolution approving the negotiated withdrawal agreement and the framework for the future relationship for the purposes of section 13(1)(b) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 by 20 March 2019, then the Government will seek to agree with the European Union a one-off extension of the period specified in Article 50(3) for a period ending on 30 June 2019 for the purpose of passing the necessary EU exit legislation; and
- (3) notes that, if the House has not passed a resolution approving the negotiated withdrawal agreement and the framework for the future relationship for the purposes of section 13(1)(b) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 by 20 March 2019, then it is highly likely that the European Council at its meeting the following day would require a clear purpose for any extension, not least to determine its length, and that any extension beyond 30 June 2019 would require the United Kingdom to hold European Parliament elections in May 2019.
The amendment rejected in this vote was:
- (i), leave out from “Article 50 (3)” to end and add
- “to enable the House of Commons to find a way forward that can command majority support;
- 2. orders accordingly that on Wednesday 20 March—
- (a) Standing Order No. 14(1) (which provides that government business shall have precedence at every sitting save as provided in that order) shall not apply;
- (b) precedence shall be given to the motion specified in paragraph 3;
- (c) the Speaker shall interrupt proceedings on any business before the motion specified in paragraph 3 at 1.30 pm and call a Member to move that motion;
- (d) debate on that motion may continue until 7.00 pm at which time the Speaker shall put the questions necessary to dispose of proceedings on that motion including the questions on amendments selected by the Speaker which may then be moved;
- (e) any proceedings interrupted or superseded by this order may be resumed or (as the case may be) entered upon and proceeded with after the moment of interruption; and
- 3. the motion specified in this paragraph is a motion in the name of at least 25 Members, including at least five Members elected to the House as members of at least five different parties, relating to the Business of the House on a future day or days in connection with matters relating to the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union.”
The exit day had been set as 29 March 2019 at 11.00 p.m. by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||294 (+2 tell)||15||0||99.0%|
|Lab||6||231 (+2 tell)||0||97.6%|
|Guto Bebb||Aberconwy||whilst Con (front bench)||aye|
|Richard Benyon||Newbury||whilst Con (front bench)||aye|
|Nicholas Boles||Grantham and Stamford||whilst Con||aye|
|Kenneth Clarke||Rushcliffe||whilst Con (front bench)||aye|
|Jonathan Djanogly||Huntingdon||Con (front bench)||aye|
|George Freeman||Mid Norfolk||Con||aye|
|Justine Greening||Putney||whilst Con||aye|
|Dominic Grieve||Beaconsfield||whilst Con (front bench)||aye|
|Sam Gyimah||East Surrey||whilst Con (front bench)||aye|
|Phillip Lee||Bracknell||whilst Con||aye|
|Oliver Letwin||West Dorset||whilst Con||aye|
|Antoinette Sandbach||Eddisbury||whilst Con (front bench)||aye|
|Nicholas Soames||Mid Sussex||whilst Con||aye|
|John Stevenson||Carlisle||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Ed Vaizey||Wantage||whilst Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord John [Missing last name for 41744]||Bassetlaw||Lab (minister)||no|
|Kevin Barron||Rother Valley||Lab (minister)||no|
|Ronnie Campbell||Blyth Valley||Lab||no|
|Caroline Flint||Don Valley||Lab (minister)||no|
|Kate Hoey||Vauxhall||Lab (minister)||no|
|Graham Stringer||Blackley and Broughton||Lab (minister)||no|