Consideration of Covid-19 — 12 May 2020 at 18:16
The motion supported by a majority of MPs in this vote was:
- That this House has considered Covid-19
This motion was probably intended as a mechanism to enable MPs to discuss Covid-19 as the House of Commons, the vote followed a debate on the subject.
It is appears there was no impact of a vote either way in this division.
No MPs explained their voting intention during the debate.
One might posit an inference that an MP voting to say the House had not considered Covid-19 was expressing a view that the amount of time allocated to the debate on Covid-19 was insufficient.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
| Alliance | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Con | 344 | 0 | 0 | 94.2% |
| DUP | 7 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 196 | 0 | 97.0% |
| LDem | 11 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| PC | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 46 | 0 | 97.9% |
| Total: | 363 | 248 | 0 | 95.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||