Consideration of Covid-19 — 12 May 2020 at 18:16

The motion supported by a majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That this House has considered Covid-19

This motion was probably intended as a mechanism to enable MPs to discuss Covid-19 as the House of Commons, the vote followed a debate on the subject.

It is appears there was no impact of a vote either way in this division.

No MPs explained their voting intention during the debate.

One might posit an inference that an MP voting to say the House had not considered Covid-19 was expressing a view that the amount of time allocated to the debate on Covid-19 was insufficient.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alliance1 00100.0%
Con344 0094.2%
DUP7 0087.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 10100.0%
Lab0 196097.0%
LDem11 00100.0%
PC0 40100.0%
SNP0 46097.9%
Total:363 248095.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive