Extradition (Provisional Arrest) Bill [HL] — Third Reading — Amendment 2 — 15 Jun 2020 at 16:30

Moved by Lord Kennedy of Southwark

2: The Schedule, page 4, line 38, at end insert-“( ) The Secretary of State may only make regulations under subsection (7) if the following conditions are first met-(a) the Secretary of State has consulted on the merits of the change with-(i) each devolved administration, and(ii) non-governmental organisations which, in the opinion of the Secretary of State, have a relevant interest,(b) the Secretary of State has laid an assessment before each House of Parliament on the risks of the change, and(c) if the regulations are to add a reference to a territory to Schedule A1, the Secretary of State has laid a statement before each House of Parliament confirming that the territory does not abuse the Interpol Red Notices system.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would create further requirements before adding, varying or removing a reference to a territory.

Ayes 275, Noes 256.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con0 21974.0%
Crossbench48 2737.1%
DUP0 360.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Independent Liberal Democrat1 0100.0%
Judge1 113.3%
Lab130 158.2%
LDem81 276.9%
Non-affiliated10 134.4%
PC1 050.0%
UUP1 1100.0%
Total:275 25659.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Viscount Brookeborough Crossbenchno
Baroness Butler-Sloss Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Cameron of DillingtonCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Campbell of SurbitonCrossbenchno
Lord Carey of CliftonCrossbenchno
Lord Carlile of BerriewCrossbenchno
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Deech Crossbenchno
Lord Geidt Crossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Hogg Crossbenchno
Lord Janvrin Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Jay of EwelmeCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kakkar Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Levene of PortsokenCrossbenchno
Baroness O'Loan Crossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Richards of HerstmonceuxCrossbenchno
Lord Rowe-Beddoe Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of StairCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Walker of AldringhamCrossbenchno
Lord Morris of AberavonLab (minister)no
Baroness Falkner of MargravineLDemno
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemno
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive