Pension Schemes Bill [HL] — Report — Amendment 52 — 30 Jun 2020 at 18:45
Moved by Baroness Drake
52: Clause 118, page 105, line 9, at end insert-“( ) Requirements prescribed under subsection (2) must include a requirement that a pensions dashboard service may not include a facility for engaging in financial transaction activities.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment ensures that a pensions dashboard service does not include a provision for financial transaction activities.
Ayes 281, Noes 244.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Lord Cameron of Dillington||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Carey of Clifton||Crossbench||no|
|Viscount Colville of Culross||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Craig of Radley||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|The Earl of Erroll||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Hogan-Howe||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Kakkar||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Laming||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Macpherson of Earl's Court||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Patel||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Powell of Bayswater||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|The Duke of Somerset||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Stirrup||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Walker of Aldringham||Crossbench||no|
|Baroness Falkner of Margravine||Non-affiliated||no|
|Lord Holmes of Richmond||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Stowell of Beeston||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|