Pension Schemes Bill [HL] — Report — Amendment 63 (to Amendment 62) — 30 Jun 2020 at 19:45

Moved by Baroness Drake

63: Clause 122, after inserted subsection (A2) insert-“(A3) Before any other pension dashboard services can qualify under section 238A of the Pensions Act 2004 (qualifying pensions dashboard service)-(a) the pensions dashboard service under subsection (A1) must have been established for at least one year, and(b) the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a report on the operation and effectiveness of the pensions dashboard service under subsection (A1) in its first year.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment ensures that the publicly owned pension dashboard service has been operating for one year and the Government has reported to parliament on its operation and effectiveness before commercial dashboard services can qualify.

Ayes 270, Noes 236.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con5 20872.0%
Crossbench32 1925.2%
DUP0 480.0%
Green1 050.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Independent Liberal Democrat1 0100.0%
Judge2 120.0%
Lab136 160.9%
LDem82 176.9%
Non-affiliated9 131.3%
PC1 050.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:270 23656.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Aberdare Crossbenchno
Baroness Altmann Conaye
Lord Carey of CliftonCrossbenchno
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
The Earl of Cork and OrreryCon (front bench)aye
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Deech Crossbenchno
Lord Grabiner Labno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Hogg Crossbenchno
Lord Hope of CraigheadJudge (front bench)no
Lord Inglewood Con (front bench)aye
Lord Kakkar Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord King of LothburyCrossbenchno
Lord Macpherson of Earl's CourtCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Mawson Crossbenchno
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemno
Lord Northbrook Conaye
Baroness O'Loan Crossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Rana Crossbenchno
Lord Richards of HerstmonceuxCrossbenchno
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno
Viscount Waverley Crossbenchno
The Duke of WellingtonConaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive