United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — Motion B1 (as an amendment to Motion B) — 9 Dec 2020 at 14:45

Moved by Lord Stevenson of Balmacara

8L: Clause 10, leave out Clause 10 and insert the following new Clause-“Exclusions from market access principles: public interest derogations(1) The United Kingdom market access principles do not apply to, and sections 2(3) and 5(3) do not affect the operation of, any requirements which-(a) pursue a legitimate aim,(b) are a proportionate means of achieving that aim, and(c) are not a disguised restriction on trade.(2) A requirement is considered to pursue a legitimate aim if it makes a contribution to the achievement of-(a) environmental standards and protection,(b) animal welfare,(c) consumer standards, including digital and artificial intelligence privacy rights,(d) employment rights and protections,(e) health and life of humans, animals or plants,(f) protection of public health, or(g) equality entitlements, rights and protections.(3) A requirement is considered disproportionate if the legitimate aim being pursued in the destination part of the United Kingdom is already achieved to the same or higher extent by requirements in the originating part of the United Kingdom.””

Ayes 295, Noes 250.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop2 07.7%
Con1 20879.2%
Crossbench53 2343.9%
DUP0 5100.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge3 133.3%
Lab135 074.6%
LDem80 192.0%
Non-affiliated17 1147.5%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:295 25067.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Cumberlege Conaye
Lord Aberdare Crossbenchno
Lord Broers Crossbenchno
Lord Cameron of DillingtonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carey of CliftonCrossbenchno
Lord Carlile of BerriewCrossbenchno
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
Lord Cromwell Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness D'Souza Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Deech Crossbenchno
The Earl of DevonCrossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal GreenCrossbenchno
Lord Kakkar Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Lord King of LothburyCrossbenchno
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Mawson Crossbenchno
Baroness O'Loan Crossbenchno
Lord Palmer Crossbenchno
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Waverley Crossbenchno
Lord Wilson of TillyornCrossbenchno
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-HeywoodJudge (front bench)no
Baroness Barker LDem (front bench)no
Lord Faulks Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Baroness Fox of BuckleyNon-affiliatedno
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedno
Lord Kalms Non-affiliatedno
Lord Pearson of RannochNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Baroness Stuart of EdgbastonNon-affiliatedno
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Willoughby de Broke Non-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive