Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 6 — 11 Jan 2021 at 21:30
Moved by Baroness Hamwee
6: Clause 1, page 2, line 17, after “person” insert “reasonably”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would insert a requirement that belief in the necessity and proportionality of a criminal conduct authorisation, and in the existence of satisfactory arrangements, be reasonably held.
Ayes 282, Noes 259.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Lord Bichard||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Butler-Sloss||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Carey of Clifton||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Carlile of Berriew||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Chartres||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Viscount Colville of Culross||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Curry of Kirkharle||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Dannatt||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|The Earl of Erroll||Crossbench||no|
|Baroness Finlay of Llandaff||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Grabiner||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Hogan-Howe||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Richards of Herstmonceux||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Smith of Kelvin||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Stirrup||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Thurlow||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Walker of Aldringham||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Austin of Dudley||Non-affiliated||no|
|Lord Faulks||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|
|Lord Pearson of Rannoch||Non-affiliated||no|
|Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston||Non-affiliated||no|