Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 9 — 11 Jan 2021 at 22:30
Moved by Lord Paddick
9: Clause 1, page 2, line 30, at end insert “so far as those interests are also relevant to the interests of national security.” Member’s explanatory statementThis would allow a criminal conduct authorisation to be granted on economic grounds only if it is also relevant to the interests of national security, reflecting equivalent provisions in the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 and the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019.
Ayes 119, Noes 263.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Lord Alton of Liverpool||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Berkeley of Knighton||Crossbench||aye|
|Baroness Brown of Cambridge||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Cromwell||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness D'Souza||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Hastings of Scarisbrick||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Kerr of Kinlochard||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Mair||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Rees of Ludlow||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|The Duke of Somerset||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Wilson of Dinton||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Woolley of Woodford||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Rooker||Lab (minister)||no|
|Lord West of Spithead||Lab (minister)||no|
|Baroness Fox of Buckley||Non-affiliated||aye|
|Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick||Non-affiliated (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Smith of Finsbury||Non-affiliated||aye|
|Lord Tyrie||Non-affiliated (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Wallace of Tankerness||Non-affiliated (front bench)||aye|