Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 17 — 13 Jan 2021 at 18:11

Moved by Lord Paddick

17: Clause 1, page 3, line 2, at end insert-“(8A) Where a criminal conduct authorisation has been granted, the covert human intelligence source so authorised cannot be deployed unless the conditions under subsection (8B) have been fulfilled.(8B) The conditions are that-(a) notification has been given to the Investigatory Powers Commissioner of-(i) the purpose and extent of the deployment, and(ii) the type of criminal activity it is anticipated the covert human intelligence source would participate in, and(b) the Commissioner has considered the likely operational dividend against the likely intrusive effects, including the potential for collateral damage or injury, and has approved the deployment.(8C) In the event of urgency, prior approval is not required but notification must be given to the Investigatory Powers Commissioner as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event not later than seven days after the deployment.(8D) A notification under subsection (8B) or (8C) must be given in writing or transmitted by electronic means.”

Ayes 259, Noes 283.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con198 267.3%
Crossbench41 2231.2%
DUP3 060.0%
Green0 2100.0%
Independent Liberal Democrat0 1100.0%
Judge2 120.0%
Lab4 13461.3%
LDem1 8175.9%
Non-affiliated3 937.5%
PC0 150.0%
UKIP1 033.3%
UUP2 0100.0%
Total:255 25356.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Bowness Conaye
Baroness Warsi Conaye
Lord Alton of LiverpoolCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Berkeley of KnightonCrossbenchaye
Baroness Boycott Crossbench (front bench)aye
The Earl of ClancartyCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Cromwell Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Curry of KirkharleCrossbenchaye
Lord Freyberg Crossbenchaye
Baroness Greengross Crossbenchaye
Baroness Grey-Thompson Crossbenchaye
Lord Hastings of ScarisbrickCrossbenchaye
Baroness Hollins Crossbenchaye
Lord Macpherson of Earl's CourtCrossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness Masham of IltonCrossbenchaye
Baroness Meacher Crossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness Murphy Crossbenchaye
Baroness Prashar Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Rees of LudlowCrossbenchaye
The Duke of SomersetCrossbenchaye
Lord St John of BletsoCrossbenchaye
Baroness Stern Crossbenchaye
Lord Woolley of WoodfordCrossbenchaye
Baroness Young of HornseyCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Thomas of CwmgieddJudge (front bench)aye
Lord Grabiner Labno
Lord Liddle Lab (minister)no
Lord Rooker Labno
Lord West of SpitheadLab (minister)no
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemno
Lord Kalms Non-affiliatedno
Lord Mann Non-affiliatedno
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive