Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 17 — 13 Jan 2021 at 18:11

Moved by Lord Paddick

17: Clause 1, page 3, line 2, at end insert-“(8A) Where a criminal conduct authorisation has been granted, the covert human intelligence source so authorised cannot be deployed unless the conditions under subsection (8B) have been fulfilled.(8B) The conditions are that-(a) notification has been given to the Investigatory Powers Commissioner of-(i) the purpose and extent of the deployment, and(ii) the type of criminal activity it is anticipated the covert human intelligence source would participate in, and(b) the Commissioner has considered the likely operational dividend against the likely intrusive effects, including the potential for collateral damage or injury, and has approved the deployment.(8C) In the event of urgency, prior approval is not required but notification must be given to the Investigatory Powers Commissioner as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event not later than seven days after the deployment.(8D) A notification under subsection (8B) or (8C) must be given in writing or transmitted by electronic means.”

Ayes 259, Noes 283.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con214 181.7%
Crossbench45 2640.6%
DUP5 0100.0%
Green0 2100.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Judge2 125.0%
Lab3 13375.1%
LDem0 7990.8%
Non-affiliated12 1545.8%
PC0 1100.0%
UUP2 0100.0%
Total:283 25968.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Warsi Conaye
Lord Alton of LiverpoolCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Berkeley of KnightonCrossbenchaye
Baroness Boycott Crossbenchaye
The Earl of ClancartyCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Cromwell Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Curry of KirkharleCrossbenchaye
Baroness D'Souza Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Field of BirkenheadCrossbenchaye
Lord Freyberg Crossbenchaye
Baroness Greengross Crossbenchaye
Baroness Grey-Thompson Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Hastings of ScarisbrickCrossbenchaye
Baroness Hollins Crossbenchaye
Lord Macdonald of River GlavenCrossbenchaye
Lord Macpherson of Earl's CourtCrossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness Masham of IltonCrossbenchaye
Baroness Meacher Crossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness Murphy Crossbenchaye
Baroness Prashar Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Rees of LudlowCrossbench (front bench)aye
The Duke of SomersetCrossbenchaye
Lord St John of BletsoCrossbenchaye
Baroness Stern Crossbenchaye
Lord Woolley of WoodfordCrossbenchaye
Baroness Worthington Crossbenchaye
Baroness Young of HornseyCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Thomas of CwmgieddJudge (front bench)aye
Lord Liddle Lab (minister)no
Lord Rooker Labno
Lord West of SpitheadLab (minister)no
Lord Austin of DudleyNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Fox of BuckleyNon-affiliatedno
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedno
Lord Kalms Non-affiliatedno
Lord Lupton Non-affiliatedno
Lord Mann Non-affiliatedno
Lord Moore of EtchinghamNon-affiliatedno
Lord Pearson of RannochNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Stuart of EdgbastonNon-affiliatedno
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno
Lord Walney Non-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive