Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 24 — 13 Jan 2021 at 18:37

Moved by Baroness Kidron

24: Clause 1, page 3, line 16, at end insert-“29C Criminal conduct authorisations: granting to children and vulnerable sources (1) This section applies when the source is-(a) under the age of 18,(b) a vulnerable individual, as defined in subsection (5), or(c) a victim of modern slavery or trafficking, as defined in subsection (6). (2) No criminal conduct authorisations may be granted for a source to whom subsection (1) applies unless the authorising officer believes that exceptional circumstances apply that necessitate the authorisation.(3) Where a criminal conduct authorisation is granted for a source to whom subsection (1) applies, the arrangements referred to in section 29(2)(c) of this Act must be such that there is at all times a person holding an office, rank or position with a relevant investigating authority who has responsibility for ensuring that an appropriate adult is present at all meetings between the source and a person representing any relevant investigating authority.(4) In subsection (3) “appropriate adult” means-(a) the parent or guardian of the source;(b) any other person who has for the time being assumed responsibility for his or her welfare; or(c) where no person falling within paragraph (a) or (b) is available and deemed appropriate, any responsible person aged 18 or over who is neither a member of nor employed by any relevant investigating authority.(5) A “vulnerable individual” is a person who by reason of mental disorder or vulnerability, other disability, age or illness, is or may be unable to take care of themselves, or unable to protect themselves against significant harm or exploitation.(6) A “victim of modern slavery or trafficking” is a person who the relevant investigating authority believes is or may be a victim of trafficking as defined by section 2 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (human trafficking), or exploitation as defined by section 3 of that Act (meaning of exploitation).(7) The “exceptional circumstances” in subsection (2) are circumstances-(a) where authorisation of the criminal conduct authorisation is necessary and proportionate considering the welfare of the covert human intelligence source;(b) where, if the covert human intelligence source is under 18, the relevant investigating authority has determined in its assessment that the criminal conduct authorisation remains compatible with and does not override the best interests of the covert human intelligence source;(c) where all other methods to gain information have been exhausted; and(d) where the relevant investigating authority has determined in its assessment that the source to whom subsection (1) applies will not be at risk of any reasonably foreseeable harm (whether physical or psychological) arising from the criminal conduct authorisation.(8) Where a person grants a criminal conduct authorisation to anyone specified in subsection (1), that person must give notice of that authorisation to the Investigatory Powers Commissioner.(9) A notice under subsection (8) must-(a) be given in writing;(b) be given as soon as reasonably practicable, and in any event within seven days of the grant; and(c) include the matters specified in subsection (10).(10) Where a person gives notice under subsection (8) in respect of the granting of a criminal conduct authorisation, the notice must specify-(a) the grounds on which the person giving the notice believes the matters specified in section 29B(4) are satisfied;(b) the conduct that is, or is to be, authorised under section 29B(8); and(c) the reasons for believing that “exceptional circumstances” as set out in subsections (2) and (7) apply.”

Ayes 339, Noes 235.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop3 010.3%
Con17 19270.4%
Crossbench67 1239.1%
DUP3 060.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Liberal Democrat1 0100.0%
Judge5 140.0%
Lab138 362.7%
LDem83 177.8%
Non-affiliated10 340.6%
PC1 050.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:330 21359.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Altmann Conaye
Lord Bourne of AberystwythCon (front bench)aye
Lord Bowness Conaye
Baroness Cavendish of Little VeniceConaye
Lord Cormack Con (front bench)aye
Baroness Fall Con (front bench)aye
Lord Garnier Conaye
Lord Hodgson of Astley AbbottsCon (front bench)aye
Lord Inglewood Con (front bench)aye
Lord Kirkhope of HarrogateCon (front bench)aye
The Earl of LiverpoolConaye
Lord Lucas Con (front bench)aye
Baroness McIntosh of PickeringCon (front bench)aye
Baroness Stowell of BeestonConaye
Baroness Warsi Conaye
The Duke of WellingtonConaye
Lord Young of CookhamCon (front bench)aye
Lord Cameron of DillingtonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carlile of BerriewCrossbenchno
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
Lord Chartres Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Lord Green of DeddingtonCrossbenchno
Baroness Meacher Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Rana Crossbenchno
Lord Smith of KelvinCrossbenchno
Lord Thurlow Crossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Waverley Crossbenchno
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-HeywoodJudge (front bench)no
Lord Grabiner Labno
Lord Rooker Labno
Lord West of SpitheadLab (minister)no
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemno
Lord Kalms Non-affiliatedno
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive