Trade Bill — After Clause 2 — Parliamentary Approval of International Trade Agreements and Treaties — 9 Feb 2021 at 17:34

The majority of MPs voted not to require Parliamentary approval of negotiating objectives for international trade agreements, and not to require Parliament to actively approve international trade agreements prior to their ratification.

MPs were considering the Trade Bill.[1][2]

The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1B.

Lords amendment 1B[3] stated:

  • After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause—
  • Parliamentary approval of international trade agreements and treaties
  • (1) If a decision has been made by the Secretary of State to commence negotiations towards a free trade agreement, a statement must be made to both Houses of Parliament.
  • (2) Negotiations for that trade agreement may not proceed until the Secretary of State has laid draft negotiating objectives in respect of that agreement before Parliament, and an amendable motion endorsing the draft negotiating objectives has been approved by a resolution of the House of Commons.
  • (3) Prior to the draft negotiating objectives being laid, the Secretary of State must consult each devolved authority on the content of the draft negotiating objectives, and seek their consent.
  • (4) The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 is amended as follows.
  • (5) In section 20 (treaties to be laid before Parliament before ratification), after subsection (1)(b) insert—
  • “(ba) where the treaty is an international trade agreement as defined in the Trade Act 2021, a Minister of the Crown has published an analysis of the requirement for the treaty to be implemented through changes to domestic legislation, and
  • (bb) where the treaty is an international trade agreement as defined in the Trade Act 2021, the House of Commons has resolved, within period A, that the treaty should be ratified, and”
  • (6) In section 21 (extension of 21 sitting day period), after subsection (2) insert—
  • “(2A) Where a relevant Committee of either House of Parliament has recommended that a treaty constituting an international trade agreement as defined by the Trade Act 2021 should be debated in that House, the Minister of the Crown must ensure that the period does not expire before that debate has taken place

--

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con341 (+2 tell) 13097.5%
DUP8 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 40100.0%
Lab0 194 (+2 tell)098.0%
LDem0 110100.0%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 470100.0%
Total:349 276098.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
John StevensonCarlisleCon (front bench)no
Jason McCartneyColne ValleyConno
David DavisHaltemprice and HowdenConno
Jonathan DjanoglyHuntingdonConno
Bob SeelyIsle of WightCon (front bench)no
George FreemanMid NorfolkConno
Simon HoareNorth DorsetCon (front bench)no
Roger GaleNorth ThanetCon (front bench)no
Neil HudsonPenrith and The BorderCon (front bench)no
Crispin BluntReigateConno
Neil ParishTiverton and HonitonCon (front bench)no
Peter AldousWaveneyConno
Julian SturdyYork OuterCon (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive