Financial Services Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 1 — 24 Mar 2021 at 15:15

Moved by Lord Stevenson of Balmacara

1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause-“Duty of care for financial service providers(1) The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 is amended as follows.(2) In section 1C, after subsection (2)(e) insert-“(ea) the general principle that firms should not profit from exploiting a consumer’s vulnerability, behavioural biases or constrained choices;”.(3) After section 137C insert-“137CA FCA general rules: duty of care (1) The power of the FCA to make general rules includes power to introduce a duty of care owed by authorised persons to consumers in carrying out regulated activities under this Act.(2) The FCA must make rules in accordance with subsection (1) which come into force no later than 6 April 2022.””Member’s explanatory statementThis new Clause would strengthen the FCA’s consumer protection objective and introduce requirements for the FCA to make rules for financial services firms that amount to a statutory duty of care.

Ayes 296, Noes 255.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 03.4%
Con7 19568.0%
Crossbench53 2237.1%
DUP1 140.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Judge3 126.7%
Lab138 161.8%
LDem72 167.6%
Non-affiliated9 234.4%
PC1 050.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:287 22455.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Altmann Conaye
Lord Bhatia Non-affiliatedno
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-HeywoodJudge (front bench)no
Lord Butler of BrockwellCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Cameron of DillingtonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carlile of BerriewCrossbenchno
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
Lord Chartres Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Cooper of WindrushConaye
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Dannatt Crossbenchno
The Earl of DevonCrossbenchno
Lord Evans of WeardaleCrossbenchno
Lord Geidt Crossbenchno
Lord Grabiner Labno
Lord Green of HurstpierpointConaye
Baroness Hogg Crossbenchno
Lord Holmes of RichmondCon (front bench)aye
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal GreenCrossbenchno
Lord Inglewood Con (front bench)aye
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Mawson Crossbenchno
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemno
Lord Palmer Crossbenchno
Lord Pannick Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Rana Crossbenchno
Lord Stevens of KirkwhelpingtonCrossbenchno
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno
Lord Walker of AldringhamCrossbenchno
The Duke of WellingtonConaye
Baroness Wheatcroft Conaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive