Nationality and Borders Bill — New Clause 2 — Acquisition by registration: Descendants of those born on British Indian Ocean Territory — 7 Dec 2021 at 16:30

“without any legal or administrative barriers”.
“may appeal against the decision to the First-tier Tribunal.”
“British citizenship is a privilege, not a right.”
“a huge amount of money to ask children to pay”.
“does not apply if it appears to the Secretary of State that”-
“in the interests of the relationship between the United Kingdom and another country”.
“unfairness,…an act or omission of a public authority, or…exceptional circumstances”,
“the Secretary of State does not have the information needed to…give notice”
“it would…not be reasonably practicable to give notice”
“in the interests of national security”,
“As your councillor I am very concerned at some of the policies this government is sharing behind closed doors. As ethnic minority individuals I wish to share this with you and please sign and send to Paul Bristow the MP whose Government is responsible for this fiasco.”
“have been told that their Nationality cannot be revoked by an MP who has written to them on official letterhead paper. This is untrue.”
“a threat to ethnic minority Britons”.
“As an aunt to five children of mixed heritage, as someone with a sister-in-law who is Moroccan, as someone with friends who were not born in Britain, and as a human being who exists in this world, I believe this bill is inhuman, unconscionable, and evil in its intent.”
“the combined cost of applying to become a citizen in Australia, Canada, the USA and France still does not add up to the cost of a single application in Britain. The fee of £1,330 is almost four times the cost to the Home Office of processing an application.”
“in the interests of the relationship between the United Kingdom and another country, or,”
“otherwise in the public interest.”

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alba0 20100.0%
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con304 (+2 tell) 7 (+1 tell)087.0%
DUP0 7087.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent2 40100.0%
Lab0 173086.9%
LDem0 7058.3%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 38 (+1 tell)086.7%
Total:306 245086.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
John BaronBasildon and BillericayConaye
Crispin BluntReigateConaye
Peter BoneWellingboroughCon (front bench)aye
David DavisHaltemprice and HowdenConaye
Philip HolloboneKetteringCon (front bench)aye
Tim LoughtonEast Worthing and ShorehamCon (front bench)aye
Andrew RosindellRomfordCon (front bench)tellaye
Henry SmithCrawleyCon (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive