Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 55ZB — 13 Dec 2021 at 19:00
Moved by Baroness Whitaker
55ZB: Clause 63, page 59, line 11, at end insert-“(1A) The occupier, a representative of the occupier or a constable may only make a request under subsection (1)(d) if they have ascertained from the local authority within whose area the land is situated-(a) that there is a suitable pitch for P’s caravan or caravans and P’s other vehicles and property on a relevant caravan site, or(b) that, within 48 hours of their receiving notice of P’s presence on the land, a suitable pitch for P’s caravan or caravans and P’s other vehicles and property will become available within a negotiated stopping site in the local authority’s area.(1B) A “negotiated stopping site” is a site in respect of which an agreement has been reached between the local authority within whose area the site is situated and the trespassers which allows them to stay temporarily on a particular piece of land which is not an official site, in return for which the trespassers agree to certain conditions relating to, but not limited to, behaviour, tidiness of the site, the length of stay and payment for water, refuse collection and other utilities.”
Ayes 171, Noes 171.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Contents | Not-Contents | Turnout |
Bishop | 1 | 0 | 4.0% |
Con | 1 | 149 | 55.6% |
Crossbench | 15 | 8 | 12.6% |
DUP | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 1 | 1 | 18.2% |
Lab | 82 | 0 | 46.3% |
LDem | 60 | 0 | 70.6% |
Non-affiliated | 8 | 7 | 26.3% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
Total: | 171 | 171 | 41.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth | Con (front bench) | aye |
Lord Anderson of Ipswich | Crossbench | no |
Viscount Craigavon | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Falkner of Margravine | Crossbench | no |
Lord Kakkar | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Mawson | Crossbench | no |
Lord Pannick | Crossbench | no |
The Duke of Somerset | Crossbench | no |
The Duke of Wellington | Crossbench | no |
Lord Austin of Dudley | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Baroness Fox of Buckley | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
The Earl of Kinnoull | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston | Non-affiliated | no |