Health and Care Bill — Report (3rd Day) — Amendment 124 — 7 Mar 2022 at 17:15

Moved by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath

124: Schedule 14, page 237, line 41, leave out paragraph 6Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would remove the provision allowing coroners to require the disclosure of protected material.

Ayes 210, Noes 169.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 04.2%
Con0 16059.9%
Crossbench40 424.6%
DUP3 180.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Judge1 09.1%
Lab93 052.8%
LDem61 072.6%
Non-affiliated8 319.3%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:210 16946.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Dodds of DuncairnDUP (front bench)no
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
Lord Jay of EwelmeCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness O'Loan Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Walney Non-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive