Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill — Report — Amendment 11 — 25 Jan 2023 at 17:15
Moved by Baroness Hayman of Ullock
11: Clause 3, page 3, line 24, after “unless” insert “, in relation to a precision bred animal, the date condition in section (Entry into force of provisions relating to animals) has been met, and unless” Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would prevent a precision bred animal from being released unless the date condition in a later Clause in the name of Baroness Hayman of Ullock has been met. Taken collectively, these amendments would ensure a phasing in of the animal provisions in the Bill.
Ayes 192, Noes 206.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||179 (+2 tell)||0||65.3%|
|Lab||0||109 (+2 tell)||61.3%|
|Lord Alton of Liverpool||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|The Earl of Clancarty||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Masham of Ilton||Crossbench||aye|
|Baroness Morgan of Drefelin||Crossbench||aye|
|Baroness O'Loan||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Prashar||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Skidelsky||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Watkins of Tavistock||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Faulks||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Fox of Buckley||Non-affiliated||no|
|Baroness Stowell of Beeston||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|
|Lord Tyrie||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|