Public Order Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 1 — 30 Jan 2023 at 17:00

Moved by Lord Coaker

1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause-“Meaning of “serious disruption”(1) In this Act, “serious disruption” means disruption causing significant harm to persons, organisations or the life of the community, in particular where-(a) it may result in a significant delay to the delivery of a time-sensitive product to consumers of that product, or(b) it may result in a prolonged disruption of access to any essential goods or any essential service, including access to-(i) the supply of money, food, water, energy, or fuel,(ii) a system of communication,(iii) a place of worship,(iv) a transport facility,(v) an educational institution, or(vi) a service relating to health.(2) In subsection (1)(a), “time-sensitive product” means a product whose value or use to its consumers may be significantly reduced by a delay in the supply of the product to them.”Member’s explanatory statementThis new Clause defines the concept of “serious disruption” for the purposes of this Bill, which is the trigger for several new offences and powers.

Ayes 243, Noes 221.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop3 012.0%
Con1 182 (+2 tell)66.8%
Crossbench39 2133.7%
DUP0 583.3%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge1 118.2%
Lab117 (+2 tell) 065.7%
LDem66 079.5%
Non-affiliated10 933.9%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:241 21956.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Ranger Conaye
Lord Anderson of IpswichCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Butler of BrockwellCrossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbenchno
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbenchno
Lord Curry of KirkharleCrossbenchno
Lord Dannatt Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Falkner of MargravineCrossbenchno
Lord Grabiner Crossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Hoffmann Crossbenchno
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Krebs Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Laming Crossbenchno
Lord Mawson Crossbenchno
Lord Mountevans Crossbenchno
Lord Pannick Crossbenchno
Lord Peach Crossbenchno
Lord St John of BletsoCrossbenchno
Lord Turnbull Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Vaux of HarrowdenCrossbench (front bench)no
The Duke of WellingtonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Faulks Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedno
Lord Moore of EtchinghamNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Truscott Non-affiliatedno
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Verdirame Non-affiliatedno
Lord Walney Non-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive